YAM_spectrum
patreon
부정투표의심정황 negative voting situation
🕑 Added 2020-07-30 01:50:03 +0000 UTC안녕 친구들. 나는 지금 매우 중요한 투표를 하려고합니다. 자세히 들어주세요.
Hi guys. I am going to vote very important now. Please listen carefully.
이번 캐릭터 투표중 17번과 18번 캐릭터를 추천한 어떤 후원자가, 후원을 끊고 패트리온계정까지 지웠습니다. 그리고 최근 들어온 몇분의 계정이 비슷하다는 사실을 확인했습니다.
During this character's vote, a sponsor who recommended characters 17 and 18 cut off the patronage and deleted the patriot account. And I noticed that the recent few minutes of accounts are similar.
부정을 의심하는 득표수는 2표입니다.
Two votes are suspected of irregularities.
고민끝에, 17번 18번 캐릭터의 투표를 취소할것인가에 대한 의견을 묻게 되었습니다.
At the end of my worries, I was asked if I would like to cancel the vote for characters 17 and 18.
나는 여러분 한분 한분의 후원과 관심을 존중합니다.
I respect the support and interest of each and every one of you.
*지금 투표중, 의심되는 아이디 2표는 제가 따로 계산하겠습니다. *
In the middle of voting now, I'll pay for the 2 suspicious IDs separately.
Comments
Everything was over. I received the context from the ID, and he became'family tier' again. I'm going to watch his activities in the future, and I'll give him confidence again. I will post it separately.
Fortunately, since I have been through this, I will watch the trust of one of the people who recommended a character in 'Famiytier' in the future.
I am also closely watching this situation. A message came from a suspicious person after conducting this vote. There was a story. I'm going to encourage you to organize your accounts. First, I'll watch more! Thanks Beth!
I actually find it odd that paying patrons actually voted to keep the winning character, even when the family patron deleted their account and is no longer subscribed. I don't understand how people would want that character still. 🤷♀️
이 투표를 진행한 뒤에 따로 메세지가 왔는데, 사정이 있었던거 같기도해. 나이제한같은.. 그래서 일단 다시 활성화 시킬때까지 지켜볼꺼야
I agree with this statement fully.
It is not fair to Yam's patrons who have been here and are paying and participating. Those characters should be deleted.
엄청 좋아하는 캐릭터였나보네요?ㅎㅎ
kakarotte
If a family tier patron suggest characters, but doesn't keep patronage for the billing cycle, those characters should always be removed in my opinion, even if they get selected. They did not have the right to suggest characters in the first place. Next ones in order, should be chosen instead.
