TheBesties patreon

Our Video Game Resolutions for 2026 (and Big Hops!)

🕑 Added 2026-01-27 08:01:01 +0000 UTC

Comments

Justine Mann

chris isn’t a sore loser, russ is a sore winner! (kidding, all love)

Josh

Is this copypasta or just ragebait?

Little Mel

Hi Resties! So one of my goals for 2026 is to try 4 video games featured on The Besties. 😊

Ben Stewart

This childish bickering is unlistenable! Please move on to something approaching interesting

David Miller

So in a 2012 interview, Miyamoto apparently officially went on record stating the Koopalings were NOT Bowser's children & are just child laborers working for him, so in official Nintendo canon, Bowser Jr. is his only legitimate child...

glassfunyun

So... which child does Bowser like the most?

Paul Belemjian

If you guys like TR-49, check out Type Help here https://william-rous.itch.io/type-help

David Edgar

I backed Big Hops on Kickstarter not knowing what it would be. It's quite interesting and very well made for a small team. I beat it and it's worth making it through.

Sequester Grundelplith, MD

Debates like these are great. In reference to the potential additional point Plante may have earned: Reading “the switch 2 will release after X” as the “the switch 2 will release in some market after X” distorts the fundamental meaning of the claim. The meaning of “release” in the former is a binary thing - ie released to the public somewhere - and I think it’s bad faith to interpret otherwise, as explicitly stated in the latter. Whereas the claim “Nintendo will advertise the durability of the joy cons” wouldn’t necessarily prohibit the advertising within certain markets on its face. Russ’s argument against the latter definition highlights the absurdity in that interpretation; it implies that the switch 2 has still never been released, and therefore the bet could go on indefinitely. Plante’s counter argument (since Canada didn’t market the durability, it didn’t happen) is compelling, but flawed. Russ isn’t saying that a thing must happen in ALL markets to have occurred. He’s saying it has to have happened in ONE market to have occurred. Therefore, this counter argument, in addition to refuting Plante’s, strengthens his own claim. This was a fun one.