Do you want a separate package for older animations and newest animations??
🕑 Added 2019-04-07 00:52:24 +0000 UTCSometimes it is very tedious to disable old animations because they do not have the same quality. The most of time I just want to play with the best animations/sequences. So the question is simple... Do you want to have a separate package for the old animations of the newest ones?
There would be a "new classic" package and an old one. And a "new DF" package and an old one. Do you think it's functional?
Comments
Obi
Mike, to answer your specific question, "Is it functional?" I would have to say yes it's sounds functional. Having a cleaner and more sorted animation list would help. But, at the same time, if this is a tedious process to bring to the table, then I would rather see you working on more "amazing" content. Just when I thought I have seen your best work, you put something else incredible out there. So, whichever is easier for you, I would say go with that.
Mike24
Change the names is something more difficult, it's a titacnic's task. But at least, the best option (IMO) is to have only the best animators installed and the best sequences.
instantmagic
Not just you, but al animators- It would be great if we had a date on them somewhere or a number sequence. It confuses a lot of people to have the same name, just sayin.
Mike24
Thx! .=)
Sportsfoodie4
whatever is easier for you, no complaints on my end! :)
Joel Saad
no problem
hallie
I don't mind, but I went with "yes" - if it's easier for you then by all means!