Trisha Tarantino patreon

Revealing James Charles' DM & Reacting to Shane Dawson's Baby News | Just Trish Ep. 38 Extended

🕑 Added 2023-12-13 20:20:53 +0000 UTC

Comments

MK Average

I think the difference between creeps online & creeps at the park is, you’d leave if there was a creep at the park taking pictures of your kid & jacking off on the bench. Or you’d call the cops. You wouldn’t stay & say, “well I need to pay my bills so I guess it’s just part of coming to the park.” I think it’s okay if influencers have kids & their kid is in their content IN PASSING. The kid isn’t the content but it’s just like normal a part of their life, the kid is not the focus & it’s not for more than a few minutes at most. But anything where, if there was no kid there’d be no content, is not okay. And there are creeps watching for kids who show up briefly in someone’s content so you really have to consider what you’re willing to subject your kid too. I personally would never show my kids, but I do understand the occasional video that would be normal for a non influencer to post vs child based content. Choosing to continue to exploit your kids lives, use them to pay your bills & subject them to pedophiles is not okay, period. And making your kid go to school without their consent vs exploiting them & making some of your income from the pedos who watch them are two very different things. Saying kids can’t consent to anything so the consent argument isn’t valid is a dangerous line to walk. The same argument could be used by pedos, especially ones who manipulate their victims into thinking the assaults are loving & positive. So just because technically a child can’t consent to anything doesn’t mean we can just do what ever & use them for whatever we want as adults. I’m sure if you knew that there were pedos at malibus school you wouldn’t force her to go against her will.

Did that Reddit documentary you were making ever come about?