MattOrchard
patreon
Elvis Presley's Suspicious Minds: An Analysis
🕑 Added 2023-10-15 03:33:43 +0000 UTCA little bonus to tide you over - hope you like it! I'll be trying to sporadically get little things like this up in the lead up to the WM3 case. Let me know your thoughts in the comments! Next time I see you should be the Sandy Melgar Creator Commentary, hopefully in a couple weeks or so.
WM3 Update:
The good news is the writing stage is now well under way, and I think we're going to have one hell of a video once all is said and done. The bad news, as has always been the case, is that there is such a mammoth amount of ground left to cover before even voicing and "animating" said mammoth script. Half the battle really will be figuring out what can be left out. We will prevail though!!!
Thanks as always for your support :)
Comments
Tabitha Miles
Were you high when you listened to this? π
Edwin Dover
I have been a patreon of yours for a year now. However I cannot abide this revolting slander of The King. I would like a full refund and a written apology without delay.
Laura Elizabeth
Not the subtitles saying, "Elvis is a cat" lol
muruba
This little "Elvis is a cad" analysis made me chuckle out loud and was exactly what I needed to relax after a day of teaching. Thank you β₯
Glenn Wallace
This is such a great breakdown and insight into his mind. Obviously we know heβs a cheater and liar but to see him defending his lies in music and gaslighting is very interesting. Good work Matt!
Matt Orchard
The host has a bit of an arrogance problem that sometimes hinders his message. For instance, he at one point brags that people have said his sound quality sucks and he doesn't give a damn because he's just all about the FACTS. And it's like, yeah dude that's great but you are choosing an audio medium to convey all that so maybe incorporate the feedback - even if it's phrased nastily. That sort of stubbornness makes me question if they're not themselves looking at things with a very narrow mind. Having said that, to reiterate, I did find some of the things he put forward valid and regret not being aware of them at the time I made my video.
Matthew B.
Dad?
Amanda Boo Berry
Bam! Nailed it!
Matt Orchard
Sounds like a magical evening
Warren Commission Test Skull
I once fingerbanged a beautiful older doctor woman to this song while belting out the chorus and driving her home on I-95 in my Nissan Cube one evening in the early 2010s. Needless to say I have the fondest possible memories of this song.
Kurt Narten
Mark James catching a stray there. π
m.j.j. Schuurbiers
Thank you so much for the source. I'm actually subscribed to that podcast but it's a slog. bad titles or generic titles, a lot of referring back to other episodes with no way of finding it, no classification at all and frankly, half of the episodes are not listenable.
Matt Orchard
I'll def go into that in really broad strokes but won't have time to do enough of a refresh to really give a rundown of much nitty gritty. The long and short of it is I found a podcast (with perhaps the worst search optimized title I've ever seen) called "Truth Is Justice" which called some of the talking points I presented into serious question. You can check it out here for a far more thorough "Sandy is Guilty" presentation than I'll be able to offer on the commentary. Should be on Spotify and all that too :) https://www.truthisjustice.com/podcast/
Miranda Stone
Harsh. Yeah what dirty dog. BUT the bridge, Matt. I hate bridges but this one is beautiful.
m.j.j. Schuurbiers
O I hope you'll elaborate on the new info you got on the melgar case. I heard in the scribe light interview you did you shifted your opinion slightly and I'm dead curious.
