SIFTD
patreon
GameFace Episode 326
🕑 Added 2023-01-18 19:00:32 +0000 UTCWe continue our 2023 previews with Xbox! Plus, The Last of Us on HBO, revealing games too early, Ubisoft's uncertain future, and more!
Patrons who pledge $4 or more per month get GameFace four days early and access to private MP3/Podcast versions of the show. To permanently set up your GameFace podcast feed register on SIFTD, link your Patreon account to SIFTD using the link in SIFTD's header, and go to:
https://siftd.net/content/127104/gameface-episode-326
Click the podcast link at the bottom right of the player and then paste the unique URL that's generated into your favorite podcast app. Paste the URL in the website address field of your browser and not the code that is generated on the webpage. The link should look something like this with your user name in it:
https://siftd.net/podcast/gameface/XXXXXXX/shane
Your feed is set up for good!
Comments
Jérôme Archambault
As an economist that looked at mergers, it hurts me every time you guys talk about the Activision deal lol :p. Patcher was quite accurate overall. It has nothing to do with the potentiality of creating such and such and everything to do with current market shares. In ways it is indirectly related to owning popular IPs as this is related to market shares. If company owns 100% of shooters it doesn't matter that a new studio could create one. What matter is now, and what is the market exactly: shooters or war shooters or WWII shooters... etc. If the market definition is more precise, the share is higher and merge might become an issue. You might disagree with how it goes but this is mostly how it is regardless of the industries. If everything was based on what could be achieve it would be an infinite discussion, but, in my opinion the court should not consider what can be achieve... Way too much interpretation for lawyers...
