Patrefans
cathoderaydude from patreon
cathoderaydude patreon

Let's Try This Again: LPX!

🕑 Added 2025-07-17 17:43:25 +0000 UTC
Let's Try This Again: LPX!

Comments

Cathode Ray Dude

yep, life's just complicated.

seagull

been a while, gravis. you alright?

Akshay Anand

I'm here waiting for Eduquest Part 3. Your focus on 80s/90s computing over the past few months brings me renewed hope that you will revisit the Eduquest after almost 3 years lol

Elsie Hupp

I wonder how much more information you’d be able to find if you were able to read and write Traditional Chinese. Maybe all the people gossiping about LPX online back in the day were just doing so in a language you can’t read! Yes, I recognize that “LPX” is a Latin acronym, but foreign words get transliterated into Chinese homophones all the time. For instance, when I visited Shanghai in 2011 I went to a clothing store called “Urban Renewal”, but on my credit card statement it was spelled something like “Erben Linuwo”, which I assume is a re-transliteration of the Chinese characters back into Pinyin. When it comes to Chinese companies marketing in the West, personally I would prefer Pinyin transliterations or direct literal translations to the alphabet soup we get on Amazon. There is a norm in the West that we don’t translate proper nouns, though sometimes we replace them with cognates (e.g. Charles/Carlos/Karl/Carol) or modify the spelling to make them easier to pronounce, but a lot of proper names for things in Chinese have much more legible direct translations just based on the characters used to write them. For illustration, here’s Xiran Jay Zhao: https://youtube.com/shorts/kWdAsbWr9aE Grape Teeth! https://youtube.com/shorts/e79M2UCFoyI (It’s interesting how these are a mix of literal meanings and convenient homophones.) https://youtube.com/shorts/sWaPOujevOs More of an explanation of the process at work here: https://youtube.com/shorts/9mRAOGBRUlg

J Brandt Buckley

After watching the side channel video, I tried to find the spec myself to no luck. Some of the historical PDFs I collected while searching were kind of interesting though: https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1qDux4tVFvbucDLlOGitJEJmj2p0IRL8N I ended up going down a rabbit hole of my own making to answer the question: What was the historical context of Western Digital's involvement? (See the "_Highlighted" dir for sources.) Summary: In the mid-to-late-80s Western Digital went on a M&A buying spree in pursuit of a vision they called "interarchitecture". According to WD, having control over more pieces would allow them to build tighter integrations for better performance and cost. (I imagine the prospect of being able to lock down that part of the ecosystem was also not lost on them.) On 1987-04-30, they announced they would be acquiring Faraday Electronics, a company whose jam was creating motherboards with a bunch of functionality consolidated into a handful of chips. That reduces the bill of materials, cost, manufacturing complexity, and power consumption of the final product -- by 60-80% if you believe their marketing. The LPX motherboard seems to have come out of that acquisition. Also in April 1987, IBM announced the PS/2. IBM made it clear they'd be exerting more control over it so as not to be undercut by the clones again. That triggered an industry-wide backlash that resulted in the development of a bunch of standards outside of IBM. It's possible this is an example of one such company paving their own road. That said, in 1990, WD had a some cross-licensing agreements with IBM and was negotiating a role in the manufacturing of IBM's first laptops. So they might have had a cozier relationship with Big Blue than the "gang of six" companies. WD didn't do much to execute their integration vision in the first few years post-acquisition, but they announced a renewed focus on it in 1989. To that end, they built a big new HQ and a $119-million fab in Irvine, CA. Ultimately, the level of integration they envisioned never came to pass -- at least not under WD's auspices. Around 1994, they began selling off some of their acquisitions. They seem to have either fully integrated or dissolved most of Faraday, though.


More Creators