An Update on the Honey Investigation
🕑 Added 2025-03-31 22:45:26 +0000 UTCHey everyone,
If you have any questions, feel free to drop them in the chat. Can't promise I can answer all of them, but I'll do my best!
Cheers,
Jono
Comments
Alexander
I saw in news that class action was denied. Rly? Will you appeal?
Sharad Rooprail
Been some time are you okay? Joined your patreon to support a bit
Devin Massingill
Thank you for all you have done so far, no worries and no pressure. I love your lamp btw!
Andreas
Thanks for the update, it's great to hear from you π You can share links to unlisted chrome extensions btw. Did that for an extension I created for my workplace.
MegaLag
Sure. The coupon I found was from either RetailMeNot or Coupert. I intentionally avoided disclosing this, as I didn't want to advertise Honey's competitors as a "better alternative". All of these extensions are, in my opinion, illicit in some way or another. I have no idea if the code provided to me was single use, as I did not complete the purchase for every code I tested. However, the point made in that specific part of the video, was that I was easily able to locate a better code elsewhere, which was true. Ryan's claim that I obtained the code by signing up for a newsletter is false. His only proof for this, is that the option to sign up for the newletter can be seen in my screen recording. Very odd! If you want further proof that Honey doesn't intentionally hides the best coupons, you can visit princesspolly.com.au and test out Honey. They iterate between allowing either no coupons or a Honey exclusive vanity code of 10% off. Once you've done that, you can try the code: "MILLIEW20" which I found by searching "princess polly haul" on youtube.
Phantomsplit
Any response to Ryan Hudson's claims that you used single-use codes to demonstrate that Honey doesn't offer the best publicly available, mass-use codes.