Patrefans
filmcrithulk from patreon
filmcrithulk patreon

The DOCTOR WHO Rewatch Project - Season 5

🕑 Added 2023-10-16 19:42:30 +0000 UTC
The DOCTOR WHO Rewatch Project - Season 5

Comments

Hahahahaha see this is why I rarely go back and look at my old writing. It's funny cause I was watching live and I think I just fell into that thinking and it's just I understand SO MUCH MORE about writing now. But the real thing is I think me and most people binged a lot of the Tennant Era and suddenly we went week to week with the moffat era and OF COURSE that would play into the dynamic. Having just watched both tennant and the smith eras in the last month, I fully abandon that position. I wasn't seeing what I was REALLY seeing at the time.

Riemann Zeta-Jones

Reading these posts has made me go back and read your original Doctor Who essay from 2011 (which was 100% the straw that made me finally start watching Doctor Who, so, thanks a billion) and it's interesting to see how some of your opinions have evolved. Even in that article, you say "MOFFAT’S INDIVIDUAL EPISODES PROBABLY INCLUDE 13 OF THE 17 BEST IN THE SERIES. BUT OVERALL WORK AS SHOW-RUNNER STILL SLIGHTLY UNEVEN" and "WHILE MOFFAT MAY BE THE BETTER INDIVIDUAL WRITER, DAVIES HAD TRUE GIFT FOR DEVELOPING THE ARC OF A SEASON." Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like you also believed the “Moffat is undeniably good at singular episodes, but Davies was better at season arcs” convention. I mean, I did, too, at the time. It's just neat how both of our opinions seem to have shifted in the same direction over the last decade or so.

Matthew Kay

I always feel like a sad minority on season 5 😅 which isn’t to say I dislike it overall, though I find most of the episodes to be middling (Amy’s Choice and Vincent, though, are wonderful). It is just sadly the start of the New Who run I find the least satisfying, the Matt Smith era, which sounds like Smith’s the problem, but really he, Gillan and Darvill are the saving graces of the whole run. I think Moffat is indeed good at seasonal arcs, but I think it takes him until Capaldi’s run to really nail it, when the arcs are fundamentally character driven and preoccupied with how the interpersonal drama develops episode to episode. Whereas in s5-7, it always feels like plot comes before story, with the exception of Rory having a genuinely sweet arc this season and the first half of season 7 is a great final run of episodes for the two of them. Smith’s chummy, aloof mannerisms are a delight and I wish they were complimented by a characterisation that didn’t frame him as the centre of the universe. I just can’t grab onto the larger-than-life Lonely God characterisation of the Doctor (not that RTD shied from this either, but Moffat REALLY loves it), maybe because it forces everyone’s relationships with him to sound like they’re in a book club discussing a fictional character, not someone they actually know and interact with. And thank god for Karen Gillan being one of the best damn living actors, because her performance really is the only thing with Amy I can really connect to. Any personal details feel like anecdotes drowned out by making her a “plot relevant companion.” The insinuation that she’s invited to travel in the TARDIS because of her connection to the crack in the wall honestly sounds like a kid being told their best friend only hangs out with them because of the things they own and I always feel so bad that Amy’s saddled with this being her primary focus for most of her first two seasons on the show. Also, definitely know what you mean by the “not fully cooked yet” feeling of the Beast Below. I think it comes from how great the pitch is, showing how people wilfully look away from the harm caused in the name of progress because they can’t confront how they are themselves complicit, contrasted with a certain naivety in filling the story with authority figures, including the “Bloody Queen, mate”, apparently feeling the same burden of guilt and only doing the horrible things they do because they have no other choice. It’s a one step forward, two steps back thing that’s definitely not unique to Beast Below. There’s often a handful of episodes in every era that’s trying for a progressive take but gets bogged down by the little traditionalist voice in the back of the writer’s head.

There is a bit of me that loves Matt Smith the best of all the new Doctors. There was a lot of to-do over the casting of this conspicuously young guy (especially when everyone was convinced it would be Paterson Joseph) but he's so so good at playing old. Reading your analysis, I wonder if it's also because his take on the character is much more alien. Tennant carried all that damage but he still felt like a guy you might actually meet and have a relatively normal conversation with. Smith's Doctor is profoundly not from round here.


More Creators