Patrefans
Honour Rae from patreon
Honour Rae patreon

24. Tess Caught Boy

🕑 Added 2022-07-19 21:30:08 +0000 UTC

Comments

Connor

And commentary as a reader! (Maybe this should go first next time.) The phrasing on the Return To Start card is interesting. "When the wielder of the card is *attacked* with another card's power" is pretty specific, and I imagine this contributes to its relatively low ranking given how useful this power could be. (Not that rare is exactly low in objective terms.) It's not obvious how "attacks" are determined, and certain forms of power application (e.g. mind control, say) might not count as an "attack". Even conventionally "obvious" physical attacks involving a card's power might not trigger Return To Start: for example, if someone with a super-strength card throws a rock at him. And then back on the interpretation front, it seems possible the card might trigger even in response to harmless effects: imagine if he's attacked with a card that summons the equivalent of a flame from a Zippo lighter, or if a glancing blow lands on him but does no real damage. That could be a critical liability if fighting in a group or in defense of someone helpless: you take one hit from a card's power and get hurled far away (possibly arbitrarily far, depending on what location is keyed in), leaving behind your allies or your now-defenseless charge. Though on the positive side, there's also nothing in the wording that explicitly keeps the card from activating in response to an attack from one's *own* cards. If the card can be applied this way, it could essentially function as a once-a-day teleport if needed. There's likewise some flexibility in the wording about locations: my assumption is that he can only key in a location if he's there at the moment, but that might not be true, or might cease to be true with sufficient experience using the card. Overall, very intriguing. (Has there been any indication that cards can grow with their user? Or that phrasing can change at all, or interpretation of it become looser with experience? Or is that kind of modification only possible to the very limited degree that Special cards might permit.) > They had meant to kill the pair of them. Planned it out. Very interesting that they didn't claim the rider's card, then! I wonder what got in their way. (It's hard to imagine that the murderer lost track of the body entirely, and even if they did, they'd have vastly superior mobility with which to search for it compared to Arthur and Second. Interesting...) > It was easy to imagine his cards being plucked out of his heart and swallowed down the gullet of a scourgling. Gotta say, not enthusiastic about the idea of a scourgling with a Legendary card and the time to take advantage of it! Though it's not clear how well that particular card would work for a being of presumably (at least initially?) lesser intelligence. I'm surprised we're going for the dragons so quickly, since I'd assumed they'd float around the periphery being mysterious for a bit longer while Arthur figured things out. Really, this extracts him from a lot of immediate trouble he was in, which is nice for him, but also soft-resets the plot. On the plus side, it's somewhat of a relief to be free of Second (for now?), and I'm excited for dragons—because dragons, obviously—as well as for opportunities for neat cards and worldbuilding and new characters. The dragon/rider pair he just met is already promising, and there's the question about the dragon murder. On the minuses side, this close to wipes the slate on the short-term plans he'd set up so far and removes the one big "desirable at a distance" in the setting which seemed to constitute fodder for longer-term plans (dragons), with the exception of perhaps reuniting with his father (which I think nobody expects until much, much further along). But you've earned trust so far with the story, and I'm on board for this. (Very long comment, this time. Sorry for all the reading I've forced you to do. Thanks for the chapter.)

Connor

Copy edits! (Probably looks like a lot, but most of it is minor, with some notes on clarity during moments of action. Apologies in advance, regardless—I know you're writing this at a pace of 5 chapters per week.) > He jerked up and back [...] Jerking to his feet Close repetition of the verb "to jerk" > A scourgling whistle cut through the forest. Arthur turned toward it, tense. His dagger was gone, and his new Trap card wouldn’t work until after the next sunset. The other point I'd expect him to think about here, if he's assessing his resources with respect to danger from scourglings: if death by dragon doesn't trigger the card, then would death by scourgling? I'm guessing not (unless the scourgling has a full card it can make use of, and does). > He’d seen the scourglings go straight for the cards, first. Like it had smelled it on the downed man. Plural/singular agreement problem: "the scourglings ... it had". "The downed man" is similarly unintroduced, though I can guess at which one in particular this is meant to refer to. > Doshi the silver dragon had smelled his legendary rank card. legendary -> Legendary? (capitalization) Note that earlier in this chapter you refer to a "Rare-ranked card" exactly as written between the quotes, whereas here you say "legendary rank card", with no hyphen and no -ed. This kind of terminology doesn't need to be 100% rigidly uniform, but it might be worthwhile writing up a style guide for yourself and keeping a checklist of easily overlooked terms to CTRL+F for so you can check them over while editing. > Now Arthur had a rare card to add to it. rare -> Rare? As above, noting additionally that this is a third variation ("rare card") in addition to the prior two ("Rare-ranked card", "legendary rank card"). However, in contradiction to my previous assumed edits—if you're making a deliberate choice to keep things uncapitalized when possible, I do respect that, because Fantasy Capitals can very quickly get out of hand, and are often difficult to justify in-universe if you set aside their non-diegetic purpose of Emphasis for the reader. Then all that matters is figuring out when you use which form, and keeping things consistent. > Hopefully, the town the caravan had last left would take him in. Quite hard to parse correctly on the first go; garden path sentence. > Or maybe there were so many around that all were whistling. Unclear what this means. (Literal interpretation is that when there are enough scourglings, this somehow causes them all to whistle. Complication: technically, this sentence is still referring to the trees/underbrush mentioned immediately prior, not the scourglings, and I'm being forced to guess from context that you do in fact mean the scourglings, not the vegetation.) > “Boy!” Came a girl’s voice. “Tess comes!” "Came" should technically be uncapitalized, since it's acting as a speech verb attached to "Boy!" If you find this unbearably awkward looking, as you might, then rewording might be in order. > It had four wings: two on each side which flapped so fast they were a blur. Raises a slight question of how he is able to count them, but perhaps they're not *that* much of a blur? The next sentence explicitly makes an association with hummingbirds, however, and then again throughout the chapter. > horse race jockey "horse jockey" by itself is fine. > Tess's back ridge Less awkward if not forced into a compound noun: "the ridge on Tess's back". > With the rider’s help, he pulled himself behind them. them = the rider? Or both the rider and the dragon? (I'm assuming the former, with they/them being gender neutral.) Sentence feels odd beyond that though, even if you were to swap for "him" or "her" for a sanity check. > There was almost no space between the back of the saddle and the wings. Assuming the wings are grouped together, this implies that the saddle is foward of the wings. If this is true, then the previous use of "haunches" should be changed, because haunches refer to *hind*quarters. ("A rider sat crouched low on the space between Tess’s wings and her haunches.") If this is false, then I'm not 100% sure how I'm supposed to imagine all of this, including the bit about Arthur being on his stomach (I thought he'd been pulled into the saddle? I guess it doesn't say that he was pulled into a *seated* position, even if that's what I was assuming. But then I'm furthermore not sure why he's forced by his position to remain on his stomach. And then remains that way all throughout what follows, up to arriving at the hive portal.) Overall, might need to iron this out a bit. Currently I'm assuming what is intended is that there are four wings projecting from the dragon's shoulders in the front, then the saddle behind. Note that there are also logistical issues with the space the wings will be crossing through and getting Arthur into the saddle; not sure how that works. > he clung onto the dragon "clung onto" -> "clung on to" ("to the dragon" being a modifier for "clung on") Though this is nitpicky, and eventually English will probably just give up on the distinction entirely. But think of it like "climb up to" or "walk over to". > the hives were mobbing up the aerial battles mobbing -> mopping? > “No, wait. Take me to the caravan—“ Arthur wanted to say Since this speech doesn't actually occur, consider rendering in italics and without quotes. Retconning the act of speech requires the reader to take a mental image they've already formed and discard it for another, which is jarring. > The rip loomed larger until it seemed to take up the entirety of the world, the iridescent green dragons still holding it open. Might be better to work in the green dragons detail elsewhere, since while you probably want to convey that piece of information as the author, in this particular moment it works against what Arthur is actually focused on. Could maybe use some physical description of the rip as they approach it. I believe they can't actually see through it, correct? It's just flat black? That would probably be horrifying to fly towards.

Solo

Anthrax: a serious infectious disease caused by gram-positive, rod-shaped bacteria known as Bacillus anthracis. It occurs naturally in soil and commonly affects domestic and wild animals around the world. People can get sick with anthrax if they come in contact with infected animals or contaminated animal products.

Honour Rae

ha! Great timing. I admit the first time I watched it as a kid, I didn't really like it. By the 10th, it had grown on me.

Gunnar Crider

I just recently watched that for the first time lol

Honour Rae

They're heading to the castle Anthrax....

Gunnar Crider

Tess seemed unreasonably happy to have caught a boy. Why do I get the feeling g the hive will be an all girls hive.


More Creators