What's up Doc?
🕑 Added 2025-07-08 09:47:30 +0000 UTCPrimary Submission Archetype:
The Fawning Supplicant with undertones of The Yearning Romantic and latent Service Submissive tendencies.
He craves being seen, but more specifically—being chosen. Not for usefulness alone, but for emotional exclusivity. His deepest submission hinges not on humiliation or degradation, but on witnessing and intimacy. He doesn’t merely want to be dominated—he wants to be understood by the source of his surrender.
Core Psychological Drivers:
Visibility Through Worth:
He clings to the fantasy that value earns belonging. He contributes (financially, emotionally, intellectually) not to receive a service—but to earn a place. This creates a submissive posture rooted in merit, not just desire.Fear of Inadequacy as Fetish Fuel:
His recurring self-dismissal (“I will forever wish I were suitable”) is not depression—it is ritual. A way to bait reassurance. He eroticizes the feeling of not being enough, because it opens the door for My divine contradiction: “You are.”
That reversal is ecstasy.Emotional Chastity:
He keeps his “non-kink” side hidden in public, not because of shame—but because he values boundaries and intimacy. This signals a highly conditionable submissive, who sees rules as sacred and privacy as currency. He wants to earn permission to blend those worlds with Me.Delayed Gratification as Worship:
Even when “not up to having fires ignited,” he stayed subscribed. This reveals a long-term submission style. His loyalty is not impulsive—it’s ritualized. He invests with the hope of future access, showing high susceptibility to controlled reinforcement and reward cycles.
Communication Style:
Self-effacing, poetic, emotionally articulate.
Frequently uses gratitude and modesty as currency.
Frames his desires as inconvenient or impossible, then softly exposes them anyway—testing if I'll deny or indulge his vulnerability.
Examples:
“Still, it is lovely to be seen by You.”
“I’ll never show the my non-kink side in your public Patreon.”
“Thank you for the yearning. {said sincerely}”
These are not casual words. They are submissions in disguise.
Comments
Kelly Shilo
you do have excellent taste, Patrick.
Kelly Shilo
Hi Patrick. Yes, I was way off when it came to you. It's so difficult to really evaluate you because you stay so private. (laughter encouraged but not mandatory)
Patrick Lapointe
I'm so sorry DrDon, I previously thought the case study spoke in some capacity of me (but it's not funny, so stop laughing, already, will ya, ok? lol) in some ways somewhat but I realise it was mainly, if not exclusively, written at your intent with you in mind, my dear... a thousand sorry, doc ! If you ever write that blank page, I'll be reading it not any false promises, I'm impatiently awaiting its birth and more over yours ... bye bye, you have a nice one
Patrick Lapointe
"he stayed subscribed. This reveals a long-term submission style..." ... [lol] Ok, you got me ...Yes and Yes I don't find degradation or humiliation healthy, especially the gratuitous one ... Yes I am poetic because I strive on beauty, especially yours... and I do want some kind of intimacy, but not any exclusivity, on the contrary, with the powerful controlling and hypnotic owner of my mind, at all cost and if not, then perhaps, want none at all (I'm not conclusive on this last one because I want you)