Patrefans
TheFanficGOD from patreon
TheFanficGOD patreon

CASS86- Points

🕑 Added 2025-08-28 18:12:04 +0000 UTC

Comments

TheFanficGOD

Thank you 🫀🫀🫀

Phil Meyering

I've got to say I really like this speech. Very moving.

TheFanficGOD

I believe it is poor writing on Rowling's part. The security around the Stone does not make sense in the world of the story. The threat is an adult Dark wizard. The obstacles are sized for first years. An adult with time and a wand can bypass vines, keys, chess, and a logic riddle. If the Mirror is the real lock, the earlier rooms add risk for students and nothing else. Putting the Stone in a school is also hard to defend. A school is the biggest concentration of children in Britain. Dumbledore had safer choices. He could have used adult-only wards, Gringotts (Safer ones), Ministry vaults, Fidelius, or simple sealed chambers with alarms. Quirrell returns from a suspicious trip, acts strangely, and still gets trusted access. Hogwarts notices minor rule breaking, yet a possessed professor, a troll, and multiple attacks slide through. That does not match Dumbledore's usual competence. The "he planned it to test Harry" answer fails too. It means he knowingly put three first years in mortal danger. Later books show Dumbledore trying to lower Harry's risk until he must act. The ethics do not match. The Mirror condition also undermines the whole maze. Only someone who wants the Stone but not to use it can take it. If that is true, the Mirror alone was enough, behind adult wards, with no gauntlet at all. Dumbledore even leaves the castle the night it matters. If he meant to secure the Stone, that is negligent. If he meant to force Harry's test, that is reckless with children's lives. The Stone would be safest in Dumbledore's palm. Nowhere on Earth is safer. Voldemort always avoided confronting Dumbledore. Hiding the Stone anywhere else invites attack. Keeping it on his person ends the plot in one move. So we are left with two bad options: Dumbledore did not know, which breaks his reputation for foresight, or he knew and let it happen, which breaks his morality as a headmaster. The material on the page does not support a satisfying third option. The simplest conclusion is that the gauntlet exists to spotlight the trio, not to be believable security. So, I am really not against Dumbledore per se, it's just that I find it too difficult to make sense of the plot otherwise. It always reminds me of Epicurus’s famous paradox about God. Is Dumbledore willing to prevent harm, but not able? Then he is not as powerful as he seems. Is he able, but not willing? Then perhaps he is manipulative. Is he both able and willing? Then why do so many terrible things still happen under his watch? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why is he considered the wisest guide?

TheFanficGOD

Shocketh

Meprster

Seems like someone is not a fan of Dumbledore. I enjoy the writing and this really made me rethink the sorcerer’s stone. Didn’t think about how all the tests were set up to just allow Harry and crew to solve. Interesting perspective.

TheLostGolem

Year 1 complete. Coming soon: "The Chamber of Secrets is real and it does have a basilisk?!?!"

Hunter

Oooooo, the scene is in fire!


More Creators