davebarrack
patreon
Grrl Power #1275 - White lines
🕑 Added 2024-07-15 10:00:11 +0000 UTCThank you for the support! You guys are awesome!
If Sciona could figure out a way to package her toe sparkles and sell them in dime bags, she'd be rich. Also, I assume there's some gap between a new drug hitting the street and it being declared illegal, especially if it's not standard fare. It's probably not a standard narcotic, and I assume the law has to define what the drug is before they can actually write laws about it. I don't think they need to know the exact chemical formula, but I imagine they have to supply a reasonable definition for the thing they're making a law about. I guess if some new drug called "toe glitter" hits the street, they could just make a law saying "toe glitter" is illegal, but then all strippers and children who attend a 6 year old girl's birthday party could be in trouble. And if a drug called "google" comes out, lawmakers are going to have to be fairly specific when outlawing "google."
Comments
Gelatinous Cube
I'm not a foot guy. I'm not a foot guy. I'm not a foot guy.
Timothy Mayfield
I think the "horrifyingly addictive" side effect would give it great repeat business.
eddi_TBH
Sciona has Trippy Toes.
Tim
"It's called positive reinforcement, dear. "
Anton Schleef
I was fairly certain that lawmakers had figured this problem out a while ago. Good thing too. These days the Republicans and the Democrats are so busy fighting with each other that I doubt they could agree on whether or not a new chemical substance should be banned, much less that law.
Todd Ellner
'The Federal Analogue Act, 21 U.S.C. § 813, is a section of the United States Controlled Substances Act passed in 1986 which allows any chemical "substantially similar" to a controlled substance listed in Schedule I or II to be treated as if it were listed in Schedule I, but only if intended for human consumption.'
