Decoding The Gurus patreon

Gurometer: Attia and Huberman

🕑 Added 2023-11-25 04:47:45 +0000 UTC

Comments

Jonathan Cano

If you look at the weight of evidence, Attia was great on COVID vaccines. various guests (check the summary at the top of each link) https://peterattiamd.com/briandeer/ https://peterattiamd.com/peterhotez/ https://peterattiamd.com/pauloffit/ https://peterattiamd.com/peterhotez3/ I think we can give him a little leeway when he says is is pro vaccine but anti-vaccine mandate. Also, very little time spend on covid origin talk.

Dee the Lobsterdancing Bananaland Dinosaur Monster

Have yet to listen but this is one behemoth I can’t wait to tackle! Btw - have you at DTG listened to Julian Walker’s (from Conspirituality) reporting on Brett and Heather? When you hear the phrase Mr Weinstein uses, “The Coalition Slicer Dicer”, you have to use this sound bite when you shout out DTG patrons!

Robert Andrews

https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html "10 points for beginning the description of your theory by saying how long you have been working on it. (10 more for emphasizing that you worked on your own.) 20 points for suggesting that you deserve a Nobel prize. 20 points for talking about how great your theory is, but never actually explaining it. 20 points for defending yourself by bringing up (real or imagined) ridicule accorded to your past theories. 40 points for claiming that the "scientific establishment" is engaged in a "conspiracy" to prevent your work from gaining its well-deserved fame, or suchlike. 40 points for comparing yourself to Galileo, suggesting that a modern-day Inquisition is hard at work on your case, and so on. 50 points for claiming you have a revolutionary theory but giving no concrete testable predictions."

Robert Andrews

Aficionados of a guru and academia decoding, I wonder if you had seen this "crackpot index"? Pretty sure a couple of Guru-like Brothers would score highly on this.