Decoding The Gurus
patreon
Joe Rogan, Bret Weinstein and the horrifyingly low standards in Alternative Media
🕑 Added 2024-11-27 07:50:07 +0000 UTCEditor Andy's latest creation featuring: Joe Rogan, Bret Weinstein, and briefly Destiny, in a video about the terrible lack of standards in alternative media.
Comments
Chris Wishy
Belly laughed for a good minute with the introduction to “premiere biologist of our time” and then the clip of Brett Weinstein mooing and oinking for his ad read 😂👌
Jack
Destiny does some good work, but I find myself incapable of not copying his terrible interpersonal behaviour, similarly, since I've started watching DtG I've started vaping, thanks Matt.
Elliot Nial
I used to be a Destiny hater until I… you know.. watched alot of his debates. He’s excellent. DTG are destiny on Valium.
Tim Tripp
Joe and Brett, gosh it doesn't get much more ridiculous and dishonest.
Sean Power
13 mins in: Can I ask who ‘We’ are who Brett says ‘can detect’ the badness of vaccines?
Linda Sears
Rogan and Brett’s use of “they” to describe the other side is so conspiratorial. Referring to the Democratic Party as they makes it sound like it’s a monolithic institution rather than a political party made up of people with different, often competing, wants. And then the “they” becomes not just the Democratic Party but also the news media, the bureaucracy, health providers, and educators. It’s so frustrating to see cognitives biases on full display.
Linda Sears
Thank you, Editor Andy, for inserting Moo oink into the video!
CrystalJade
To a greater or lesser degree it’s quite sad when people double down on imagination as a crutch to support their beliefs. It’s pure ego defence. They need to enter into a discourse that might not be a semblance. They seem stuck on repeat to me. As if they are all saying ‘please refuse me my offering, because this is not it.’ So it turns into a never ending game of substitution of one concept or other that captures their imagination that fails to address fully what ‘it’ is. Displeasure at perceived obligations, social conventions and prohibitions seems central. They want to be seen as if they are clarifying all uncertainty and that the world should simply be as they say it is. To hell with the methods, isn’t it so great that they’ve found the formula to monetise never ending debate?!
