Patrefans
Ria's Adventures from patreon
Ria's Adventures patreon

Godslayer Lysette: Chapter 208

🕑 Added 2024-09-20 16:35:56 +0000 UTC

Comments

Jessica

The winning strategy in an iterated prisoners' dilemma is tit-for-tat. However in the real world we don't have clearly marked buttons for cooperate or defect and we also don't have a perfect recall of moves, not even our own let alone other people's. So in the real world errors can occur leaving us in a defect/defect spiral if we play hard tit-for-tat. This is what Danitha said back in the days: "an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind." In the iterated prisoners' dilemma with errors the winning strategy becomes tit-for-tat-with-forgiveness. However, the theory doesn't quite translate when instead of points we have human lives at stake. If a person or a people/state can expect forgiveness they will more easily commit atrocities. This is why knowing whom to forgive and when is quite a profound question. In real life we have the saying "never attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity", however, we also have the saying "once is an accident, twice is negligence, thrice is deliberate". I am taking Reciprocity serious because I believe it to be the foundational principle of ethics, that is the idea that you can't claim protection under an ethical rule unless you are first willing to grant that same protection to everyone else. And thus if we want to be forgiven for the stupidity of our youth, and I very much do want that, we have to also offer the same forgiveness to everyone else first. With that, however, we run head first into the fundamental attribution error, which is the tendency of people to excuse our own shortcomings with our situation, like our sub-optimal upbringing or lack of information, while attributing the shortcoming of other people to some fundamental aspect of their personality. And that makes it easy to explain to ourselves why we deserve forgiveness while others do not. If we take our own desire for peace serious we need to find a way to elevate ourselves above mere tribalism and class warfare. And to do that we need to answer the question of what to forgive and what to reproach. Because if we forgive nothing we all deserve to die, but if we forgive everything we all will die. And if we draw an arbitrary line our lives will be at the mercy of those that do get to draw that line, but if we claim no such line can be drawn we are back at might makes right. And this tension really is at the heart of this story. Asterion claims that no such line can be drawn unless there is a single most powerful deity to draw it. His error becomes apparent as soon as we ask why that should be him. The eternal war of the gods is exactly the result of this approach. Lysette on the other hand wants to let the majority decide. Her error is not quite as apparent because we are so used to democratic propaganda, however, Karcheck was a good reminder that the "dictatorship of the majority" doesn't allow room for those that deviate from the norm. And the need for a mechanism that establishes the group volition allows for a bad actor to usurp that mechanism. This seems to only leave us with the pessimistic notion that peace itself might be impossible and we will be left with eternal warfare until the universe dies its entropy death. I'm not sure if that is my final judgement, but it brings me back to my cottage and the tea and muffins. Because there at least I can say that it isn't my fault, and I can be happy until someone kills me for it.

Bielna

Okay, after thinking for a few days, I think I should expand on this. This comment came from the fact that Lysette, for a Demigoddess of Reciprocity, is... really blind. She entered another country as a spy, attacked people in their home, killed and tortured them to death, and destroyed their souls, all for power and money. Even after understanding her actions were wrong, she made no amend, returned none of what she earned from those actions. So, if the soldiers, including Katie's mother, deserved death, what does Lysette deserve for what she has done ? She's the Goddess of Reciprocity, she should understand consequences for one's actions. Worse, the justification itself is so hypocritical, as Lysette has forgiven herself, chosen that she deserved another chance, while deciding those soldiers didn't. She holds herself as special. It's not killing in battle, like Mirae did, she decided that those people deserved death on biased, unequal criteria, and carried the sentence immediately. This in itself makes those murders unjust, one more evil Lysette committed and is accountable for. I really believe Lysette tries to be a good person, and that she will try to make amends for what she's done, eventually. But... I'm worried at some point it's going to be too late. Point that is already passed. She decided that people deserve death for crimes no worse than hers (if not here, then in Marol and Kattor), that she could take their whole life for what they've done, which means only one thing. ... So at this point, the only hope for Lysette is that the people who come after, who will decide what is right and wrong after the gods have had their power cut off, will be kinder than her. That society will decide that, even when one has committed a crime against someone's life, it does not justify taking their life in return, because society wants to be better than that. It's not a given, even nowadays, many countries have death penalty or true life sentence. That's where Katie comes in. She's showing forgiveness. Not in the sense of not killing people for wearing the wrong uniform, but true forgiveness, where someone who has committed an actual evil act by arbitrarily executing someone defenseless, who has hurt her personally and irrecoverably, still is forgiven, and she doesn't ask the perpetrator's life in return. So when I say I hope Lysette faces a situation where someone has truly hurt her, has taken a life precious to her, it's not for her to suffer. It's because I hope to see a happy ending. It's because it would give her a chance to face and choose forgiveness, so that others might see it, believe it to be good and choose to Reciprocate that forgiveness for Lysette herself, as some of the things she has committed are beyond reparation. It's not like a happy ending is a given. I hope it won't end with her betraying Reciprocity and making it an hypocritical excuse for her fight, forgiving herself for crimes she has killed others over, doing like the other asshole deities and holding herself to different, easier standards than mortals, happily having her revenge against Asterion while the families of the people she killed unjustly are left to cry. But at the same time, it would be sad if she ended up paying with her life, either literally or by being forced to dedicate herself in her entirety to the service of others. I know it could happen, that it would be a good ending, but not necessarily a happy one. I hope there will be a path where, while she will have to give up part of her life in service to others as penance for what she's done, she would still have a chance to live happily, spend some time in retirement with Mirae, raise a family. This is why I find this moment from Katie so important. Because she's choosing forgiveness rather than Reciprocity, and that is something that is likely to be necessary to have a chance of reaching a true happy ending.

Bielna

It's true, but it goes both ways. In this case, Katie accepts that Lysette killed her mother, acknowledging that she too has killed mothers. By comparison, Lysette has, on multiple occasions, stated that she might lose control and wreak havoc should one of the people under her protection be hurt. While I'm not exactly looking forward to that happening, at some point (especially as the conflict becomes to the scale of nations), Lysette will be faced with the fact that some of her people will be hurt and die, just as she has killed too. Sometimes even in circumstances that are tragic or unfair, defending their home, like the soldiers in Marol. She did have to face that already at the end of book 2, with Silver's death and Amalia's wounds, but the circumstances were such that the killers were already dead. So we don't exactly see her reaction in similar circumstances. But I have a feeling she would not exactly have accepted it as Katie did, in her current mindset. And, eventually, she will probably have to accept that some of her followers might die, and she'd leave the world soaked in blood if she went on a crusade as retaliation every time. The reverse side of the coin for the "it's an inevitable consequence of war". In truth, I don't really mind Lysette killing people depending on the circumstances. Serrena and Mirae have done so as well, with nothing indicating that it was unjustified. It's about the circumstances, between an execution and a death in battle, as well as the justification given for it, whether someone "deserves" it. Consequence of war, versus punishment and revenge. And, especially, whether there is a choice to be made. I'm not sure if I'm making myself really clear here, but... The reason why I like Katie's position is acceptance that violence might lead to violence, but should not in itself be the justification for it. Someone being violent might force you to be as well, and that's okay, it's war. But also, because it's such a "normal" consequence of war, it should not in itself becoming your only driver ; much like how her mother's death does not prevent her from looking towards the future. It's not something the old Lysette could or should have understood, when she was living peacefully in her village and not harming anyone, but the current Lysette who has accepted a path of violence can and should realize that escalation is not always the right path, even if she is, one day, hurt. Katie's decision might not be so deeply thought, but what it means in light of Reciprocity is quite significant. Lysette might realize it, she told them that they have the right to want revenge upon her, and they decided not to, despite Katie's mother being well and truly dead. Lysette might herself one day soon become in a position to want revenge upon someone, for something or someone she has truly lost (rather than reacting only to threats, as happened until now), and want to waive that right in order to look forward to a better future.

Ria Corvidiva

I think that's something to note. Yes, Lysette kills people. But she is far from the only one who has, and I wanted to draw some perspective that this is just a natural, inevitable consequence of war. People die, and those who kill have to make peace with it somehow.

Bielna

“I’ve taken the lives of mothers and daughters, sons and fathers as well." Now that's, that's a great sentence. Especially to admit this to herself in front of the Demigoddess of Reciprocity. This isn't even about trying to see good in someone who's fighting, it's about admitting that when you have done some things to others, then you have to accept that those things may end up being done to you, yet that should not stop you. I don't know if she realized that her motivation connects to Reciprocity, but I love that she used this reasoning to move forward. Other than that, I agree with Jessica, I like Jules and she's a good officer. Managing to walk the line to avoid blind faith but maintain her duty to her soldiers.

Ria Corvidiva

yep, 'did the same to me'

Jessica

I like Jules.

Jessica

"ho pulled their souls out of their bodies, and who nearly did the same." there seems to be some text missing, e.g. "did the same to me"?


More Creators